Fitch Flags Trade War Fears Across Asia, but Malaysia’s Banks Remain Steady

Fitch Ratings isn’t mincing words about a choppier outlook for Asian banks. But Malaysia? It’s sitting tight with a “neutral” rating, even as tensions climb around it.

While several economies in the region brace for fallout from a shifting U.S. trade stance, Fitch’s June 2025 update makes clear that Malaysia’s financial institutions are on firmer footing. It’s a bit of a rarity in a region increasingly marked by uncertainty—and the report doesn’t shy away from pointing that out.

Turbulence Hits Regional Peers

Let’s just say the mood in regional boardrooms probably isn’t too rosy right now.

Fitch downgraded its outlook for banks in South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand from “neutral” to “deteriorating.” Vietnam, which had been climbing, was knocked down a peg from “improving” to “neutral.”

In short, these banking systems are expected to face a tougher year ahead. The common denominator? A possible escalation in U.S. tariffs.

Fitch didn’t directly predict a full-blown trade war. But the tone was cautious—maybe even a little grim.

“There is great uncertainty around the ultimate trajectory of U.S. tariffs,” the agency noted. “But Asia-Pacific’s high degree of trade openness and its exposure to U.S. demand leave it particularly vulnerable to potential increases.”

That’s especially true for economies heavily linked to exports like semiconductors, electronics, and intermediate goods—all of which form the backbone of trade-dependent nations like Taiwan and Korea.

fitch ratings malaysia banking

Malaysia’s Exposure—But No Alarms Yet

So, why isn’t Malaysia being dragged down with its neighbors?

According to Fitch, Malaysia’s banks are better positioned due to their lesser direct exposure to U.S.-China tensions and more diversified trade relationships. Add to that the fact that its domestic banking sector is somewhat insulated, and you’ve got a buffer most regional peers can’t claim.

It’s not that Malaysia is invincible. Far from it. But the country’s central bank, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), has a strong record of macroprudential policies, keeping risk in check without overreaching.

One senior banking analyst in Kuala Lumpur, who spoke anonymously due to policy restrictions, summed it up like this: “We’re not immune, but we’re not front line either. That makes a big difference in how our outlook shapes up.”

What Fitch Is Actually Watching Closely

There are three big metrics that Fitch zeroes in on—across the board, not just in Malaysia:

  • Loan Growth

  • Asset Quality

  • Profitability

For economies now rated “deteriorating,” all three are flashing yellow. Fitch expects weaker loan demand, tighter margins, and growing stress in credit quality, especially for exporters.

But for Malaysia? These same indicators appear “largely stable,” according to the agency.

Those numbers don’t scream crisis. If anything, they point to cautious optimism—something rare in this current global climate.

China Still Weighing Down the Picture

While Fitch didn’t surprise anyone by leaving China’s banking outlook as “deteriorating,” the explanation behind that rating offers insight into broader regional risks.

China’s banks are battling a multi-front struggle: flatlining property demand, rising defaults, and tighter state control over lending decisions. The pressure’s palpable. And even though Malaysia has limited direct financial ties to the mainland, the economic ripple effects are real.

Exports to China still account for nearly 15% of Malaysia’s total trade. That’s not trivial.

Still, Malaysia’s domestic demand has been stronger than expected in early 2025, helping to blunt external shocks. Consumer spending, infrastructure stimulus, and tourism have helped keep economic momentum intact.

A one-line thought here: Domestic demand is doing the heavy lifting while the world squabbles over trade policy.

India, Indonesia, Philippines Also Hold Ground

Interestingly, Fitch didn’t sound any alarm bells for other emerging Asian markets either. India, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Mongolia all retained their “neutral” status.

Again, the logic is similar to Malaysia’s case. These markets are either less exposed to U.S. tariffs or better insulated via domestic demand.

India, for instance, continues to benefit from supply chain reorientation—firms trying to move operations out of China. Indonesia is seeing a boom in nickel-related investments. The Philippines has a strong remittance base and growing BPO sector that helps balance external trade risks.

So, while the clouds are gathering, there are still some clear skies in Southeast Asia.

Where This Might Be Headed

One bank CEO in Malaysia, speaking on background, put it bluntly: “The U.S. election will decide a lot of this. If tariffs rise again, and it becomes policy rather than campaign talk, then we’re all in deeper waters.”

Until then, Fitch appears to be playing it safe—highlighting risk without pressing the panic button.

But that could change.

If the U.S. follows through on additional tariffs, especially across semiconductors or green tech, the economic blowback could be widespread. And while Malaysia might not be the hardest hit, no one’s totally shielded.

There’s also the China question. A sharp slowdown or financial shock from the mainland could alter banking prospects across Asia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *