The business community has raised significant concerns regarding the Customs SRO 450(1)/2001, specifically Subrule 664(q). This regulation, which governs various customs procedures, has been criticized for creating opportunities for corruption and inefficiencies. Business leaders are urging the government to revisit and amend this subrule to ensure fair and transparent practices in the customs process.
The current implementation of Subrule 664(q) has led to numerous challenges for businesses. Many companies have reported increased operational costs due to the additional charges imposed by shipping agents. These charges, often deemed unlawful, include delivery order fees, late D/O charges, and equipment management fees. Such costs not only burden businesses financially but also disrupt their supply chain operations.
Moreover, the lack of transparency in the application of these charges has created an environment ripe for corruption. Businesses have expressed frustration over the arbitrary nature of these fees, which are often not aligned with international shipping laws. This situation has led to a call for greater oversight and regulation to protect the interests of the business community.
Legal and Regulatory Concerns
Subrule 664(q) has also raised significant legal concerns. The business community argues that the rule allows shipping agents to bypass established international laws, such as the Hague Rules and the Hamburg Rules. These international conventions are designed to regulate the carriage of goods by sea and ensure fair practices. However, the current customs rule undermines these protections, leading to potential legal conflicts and disputes.
The arbitrary nature of the charges imposed under this subrule has also been criticized for violating the principles of the Contract Act and the United Nations Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea. Business leaders are calling for a thorough review of the legal framework governing customs procedures to ensure compliance with international standards and protect the rights of all stakeholders.
Calls for Government Action
In response to these concerns, the business community is urging the government to take immediate action. They are advocating for a comprehensive review of Subrule 664(q) to address the issues of corruption and inefficiency. Business leaders are also calling for greater involvement of stakeholders in the decision-making process to ensure that any amendments to the rule are fair and transparent.
The government is being urged to establish a regulatory framework that promotes accountability and transparency in the customs process. This includes stricter oversight of shipping agents and the implementation of clear guidelines for the imposition of charges. By addressing these issues, the government can help create a more conducive environment for business operations and foster economic growth.
