When a puck drops in Florida or Texas, it’s not just about hockey anymore—it’s about dollars and sense. While Commissioner Gary Bettman continues to brush off tax concerns as media noise, behind the scenes, the league’s financial ecosystem is increasingly tilted. The playing field? It’s anything but level.
Some players are starting to call it out. So are agents, GMs, and even fans. This year’s Stanley Cup Final between Edmonton and Florida has only intensified the spotlight.
Canadian Grit, American Incentives
At first glance, Connor McDavid and Matthew Tkachuk seem to be chasing the same dream. But financially? They’re on different planets.
Edmonton’s McDavid earns a league-topping $12.5 million a year. Subtract Canada’s combined federal and provincial taxes—especially Alberta’s—and a hefty slice disappears. Meanwhile, a Florida Panther can skate home with far more in pocket, even on a smaller deal. Florida, Texas, Nevada—states with no income tax—are making a quiet mockery of cap parity.
This isn’t conjecture. Agents are privately warning Canadian franchises: either sweeten the off-ice perks or prepare to lose talent.
Bettman’s Blind Spot or Intentional Spin?
Bettman has been clear—he doesn’t think it’s a problem. During his press availability at the Stanley Cup Final, he dismissed the issue outright.
“There are so many factors that go into a player’s decision,” he said. “Taxes are just one of them, and not the most important.”
But is that true? Ask any financial planner in pro sports. Ask the agents who negotiate deals daily. Or better yet, ask the players themselves.
One agent, speaking anonymously, was blunt: “It’s a huge factor. If you’re being offered the same contract in Florida and Calgary, it’s not even close.”
Even some team executives are quietly fed up. “We’re capped, but not equal,” said one Western Conference GM.
The NHL’s ‘Net Pay’ Problem
Here’s the meat of the issue: while the NHL enforces a strict salary cap, it’s based on gross earnings. So, a $7 million deal in Toronto is not the same as a $7 million deal in Tampa Bay.
That’s a $1.65 million difference between Toronto and Miami—for the exact same gross salary. Over an eight-year contract? That’s more than $13 million.
Talent Drain or Just Smart Economics?
So is this already hurting Canadian teams? Some say yes. Others argue it’s too early to tell.
-
The Toronto Maple Leafs, for instance, have struggled to keep their core together without overpaying.
-
Calgary lost both Johnny Gaudreau and Matthew Tkachuk in one summer.
-
Vancouver has had to offer more than market value to retain top players.
It’s not always about the taxes, of course. Climate, media pressure, travel, and team competitiveness all factor in. But when it’s close, money talks.
The League’s Patchwork Response
So far, the NHL has done little to address the imbalance. There’s no adjustment mechanism for taxation. No incentives for small-market or high-tax teams. No effort to peg the salary cap to net income.
Other leagues are watching too. The NBA and MLB face similar concerns, but their higher overall revenues and looser cap structures allow more wiggle room.
Some have proposed ideas:
-
A “tax equalization fund” to balance the books behind the scenes
-
Regional exemptions or tax credits for teams in higher-tax jurisdictions
-
Even a move toward net cap accounting, though it would be complex
None of this is even remotely on the NHL’s radar—publicly, at least.
Fans Are Wising Up, and Speaking Out
Fans aren’t blind. Especially in places like Alberta, Manitoba, or Ontario, where provincial taxes hit hard.
“I love the Oilers,” says Emily Butt, a new fan from Newfoundland now in Alberta. “But I can’t blame players who pick a U.S. team. Wouldn’t you?”
Even casual fans are starting to talk numbers. It’s not just barstool banter anymore—it’s becoming part of the sport’s cultural currency. Who’s overpaid? Who’s underpaid? Who’s just playing the tax game better?
As one Reddit comment put it, “The Florida Panthers have a second power play: the tax code.”
The Uncomfortable Future
This issue isn’t going away. In fact, it’s probably going to get worse.
More American states are flirting with zero-income tax laws. Meanwhile, Canadian provinces have little wiggle room to lower rates. Players are getting savvier, and agents more aggressive.
Teams north of the border will either have to find new ways to win players over—loyalty, legacy, or lifestyle—or they’ll keep losing out.
No one’s asking Bettman to wave a magic wand. But maybe, just maybe, it’s time to stop pretending this isn’t real.
